Quarterly Commentary
4th Quarter 2011
International Markets
International equities reflected significant volatility and unpredictability during the fourth quarter as
markets moved up and down and generally finished positive for the final quarter of 2011. As the year drew
to a close, most investors had concluded that the continuing woes of the Eurozone were unlikely to be fixed
quickly. Policy and macroeconomic moves weighed heavily on equity markets and continued to be the key
driver for performance with underlying stock fundamentals taking a back seat. Economic indicators in the
U.S. seemed to reflect continued growth albeit at low levels. Overall, global economic markets have been
reliant on consistent efforts from central banks to add liquidity into the financial system to prop up asset
prices in an environment where deleveraging is required to deal with a long period of accumulated debt
from both consumers and businesses. During the quarter, equity markets in the U.S. performed well but
specific areas of Europe, Asia and the emerging markets struggled to deliver positive returns.
The MSCI EAFE Index rose 4.07% in local terms and 3.33% in USD terms. Index markets generally were
mixed in Europe with major indices reporting in local terms: Austria -1.93%; Spain 1.05%; Italy 4.11%;
and the United Kingdom 9.36%. In Asia, major country indices provided mixed performance as reflected
by Japan -4.04%, Singapore -1.51%, and Hong Kong 6.04%, respectively. On a relative basis, the U.S.
market outperformed global markets as the S&P 500 index returned 11.82% versus 3.33% for the MSCI
EAFE Index in USD terms. Additionally, performance in emerging markets was positive as reflected by
the MSCI Emerging Markets Index reporting 4.84% in local terms.
Outlook and Positioning
During the fourth quarter the world's stock markets jumped twice in response to a new flood of freshly
printed money, first by the US Federal reserve in early October and then by the European Central Bank
(ECB) in late November. Banks in Europe appeared to be facing a serious shortage of short term liquidity
as the tragic and sometimes comical dithering of European leaders shut down access to private investment
flows. The unworkable network of poorly capitalized, opaque, complicated and highly levered "special"
investment vehicles that were positioned as the solution for Europe gave way to the old favorites of swaps,
repos and lowered collateral standards. The ECB's three year LTRO (long-term refinancing operation)
proved to be hugely popular with the parched banks as they took down $650 billion in funding that the
central bank "hopes" to be recycled into Eurozone sovereign debt. This continued the pattern of the markets
in 2011 — where the disappointment of cheap talk was followed by the excitement of cheap money —
resulting in manic price movements that commentators termed "risk on/risk off." The outcome was historic
levels of asset price correlations combined with the lowest level of serial correlations ever observed; stocks
tended to go up and down together but never in the same direction for very long. This was a difficult
environment for bottom up, fundamental value investors such as us that depend on asset price dispersion
and sustained mean reversion. Portfolio positioning relative to the market's "volatility" was the key to
relative performance and the markets tended to reward being short volatility last year. During the quarter,
factors such as low beta, high yield and high quality provided the best results while value, high earnings
volatility, high beta, low yield and small size showed poorly.
Through all of this noise, there were some underlying fundamental trends related to margins, profit growth
and the steady rebalancing of the global economy. Three pillars of the "super-cycle" theme in evidence
since the late 1990's underperformed last year: financials, commodity cyclicals and emerging market
stocks. To our investment team, this reflects a transition away from those earnings driven largely by
increasing leverage, monetizing higher prices and trading of inflated assets. In contrast, our view is that the
ability of companies to grow in the future will rely on the efficiency and effectiveness by which both
companies and countries employ scarce capital and savings. Additionally, consumption will be funded by
rising incomes and actual wealth. Some investment observers would call this the "Old Normal."
Throughout 2011, this phenomenon manifested itself fundamentally in the steady decline in earnings
growth expectations. Notably at the beginning of 2011, bottom up forecasts called for the best margins in
human history and profit increases of 15% globally. However, by the fourth quarter, the level of analyst
estimate reductions and lowered company guidance had reached levels last seen in late 2008 and early
2009. Moreover, the number of companies in the S&P 500 guiding earnings downward reached the highest
level since the 2001 recession. In Europe, the revisions were rapid and significant with expected growth
halving in just the month of October. To contrarian value investors, this represented a significantly positive
step in the de-risking of the markets and in particular the traditional deeper value sectors of financials and
cyclicals. The combination of low valuations and expectations are most common in the regions of greatest
uncertainty including Europe, China and the United Kingdom. Profits in the U.S. were maintained
relatively well last year given the write back of losses in the banking sector and a strong showing by
leading American consumer brands and exporters. Defensive U.S. names also did well, with
telecommunications services, utility, foods/beverages and healthcare staging a powerful fourth quarter
rally. While the solid performance of the U.S. is likely to continue in the near term, many of these stocks
are no longer attractive from a fundamental standpoint.
The investment environment, dominated by macroeconomic and policy risks, has been steadily evolving
over the past few years and has materially altered the behavior of market participants. In the U.S., virtually
all of the money placed with long only mutual funds since 1996 has been poured into equity ETF's. The
most popular question in a recent survey of institutional investors was "How do macroeconomic factors
impact your investment process?" Every day our investment team is barraged by another investment
strategy provider with a macro driven stock selection model that, in perfect hindsight, navigated the credit
collapse of 2008 and subsequent rally. Ironically, the contention that "stock picking is dead" can be proven
with the same statistical certainty that led to the conclusion "home prices have never fallen on a nationwide
basis in the US." So the consensus has evolved from trading houses to trading "volatility" using
complicated ETF factor baskets based upon macro-driven signals. Some of the most esteemed global
investors have weighed in with predictions of a "bi-modal" world of tail risks bracketed by deflationary
depression and a money printing, hyperinflationary boom. In a world where investors are positioned to
swing between extreme outcomes — might not the most likely effect be to cancel each other out? Using an
acoustic analogy, where the "noise" of exactly the opposite frequency leaves just pure "signal" — could be
an apt description of the coming year. This is not to say that stock prices won't be volatile, but that the
movement will be driven more by company-specific and possibly country-specific factors. Already, our
investment team is seeing a greater dispersion in the cost of capital and growth in domestic demand around
the world, particularly in Europe and emerging markets. Notably, a lower nominal global GDP growth
environment also produces a smaller number of companies capable of growing faster than the overall
market as firms compete to gain market share.
Ultimately, the correction of the mispricing of money, risk and assets that built up over the past 20 years
may be painful in the short term, but is also a powerful long term positive. Our investment professionals are
heartened by the recent failed attempts to suspend corrective market forces, given that this is the only way
to discourage imprudent behavior. Economies, markets and societies have become increasingly
disconnected with the consequences being felt socially and politically around the world. Unworkable and
unsustainable systems are collapsing or facing significant reform. The key improvement from an
investment standpoint is essentially better allocation of capital away from the "fantasy" financial economy
and inefficient public sector to deleveraging, savings, investment and other private uses. As this process
unfolds, markets begin to function again as distributors of capital and as a mechanism for transparent risk
and price discovery. Clearly, we are a long way from restoring the foundation of trust in the global
economy, but it is likely that the turmoil of the past few years has been a positive influence in steering
away from the path of ruin.
Currently, our view is that the market has discounted the consensus macro expectations of a mild recession
in Europe, sluggish but decent growth in the U.S., and a soft landing in China's slowdown. Therefore, from
a contrarian standpoint the risks are to the upside in Europe, the downside in the US and about mixed in
China. Our process informs us about the potential changes in market leadership and long term drivers of
growth. In short, we see a shift in the opportunities surrounding abundance and efficiency versus scarcity.
While investors are currently focused on the downside of global rebalancing between consumers and
producers, historically this has led to material improvements in total productivity and wealth. China's local
consumer goods companies are early in their development stage and the world's producers of everything
from health care, movies, aircraft, apparel, electronics, media, and advertising still stand to benefit from
rising incomes in the emerging world. Also, given the record capital spending in the commodity sectors, up
nine-fold since 2003, global consumers may also benefit from a fall in the cost of goods, further adding fuel
to plays on abundance. In short, the past decade or so has disproportionately rewarded the owners of the
things that make life necessary — while the next cycle might shift to the things that make life wonderful!
Given where we are in the global economic cycle, we believe that early cycle investments will do better
going forward, such as specific financials, global cyclicals and consumer stocks. Recent economic news
has been coming in better than expected, but the monthly data remains highly volatile and statistically
suspect due to large seasonal adjustments. The positive surprises have led to a measure of economic
sentiment at levels that are consistent with some moderation or reversal. One sector where the tone of
business has improved from very low levels is housing and construction in the U.S. Counterproductive
meddling by politicians and central bankers is always possible, but the recent signs of recovery are driven
by a gradual moderation of distressed inventory and a rise in apartment demand. We are also evaluating
individual companies with resilient cash flows – such as health care, consumer staples, software,
commercial services and household product companies. Currently, we believe it is too soon to invest in the
late cycle companies that led the market for much of 2011. Looking ahead, our investment team's focus is
on building a diversified portfolio of high quality, global industry leaders trading at attractive valuations
based upon conservative levels of profits. Our view is that demonstrated 'safety' stocks are no longer cheap
while the valuations of more distressed stocks in Europe, UK and China have become more attractive. In
emerging markets, generally our view is that valuations have more room to decline relative to the
developed world. Despite the wall of worry in equity markets, we continue to seek companies that exhibit
low valuations, depressed profitability, and low expectations and believe that there are promising
opportunities for individual stocks to deliver solid performance going forward.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Copyright © 2011 Global Currents Investment Management, LLC. All
opinions and data included in this commentary are current as of December 31, 2011. The views expressed represent the opinions of
Global Currents and are not intended as a forecast or guarantee of future results. Global Currents undertakes no obligation to update or
revise any information, opinions or forward-looking statements should they change. The information contained herein has been
prepared from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by Global Currents as to its accuracy or completeness. Neither
Global Currents nor its information providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. The
securities, sectors, industries, countries and regions discussed herein should not be perceived as investment recommendations, and
may no longer be held in an account's portfolio. It should not be assumed that an investment in any security, sector, industry, country
or region discussed was or will prove to be profitable. Sector/industry weights and country and regional allocations of any particular
client account may vary based on any investment restrictions applicable to the account. If utilized, there is no guarantee that holding
securities with relatively high (or low) price-to-earnings, price-to-cash flow or price-to-book ratios will cause the portfolio to
outperform its benchmark or index. There may be additional risks associated with international investments. International securities
and ADRs may be subject to market/currency fluctuations, investment risks, and other risks involving foreign economic, political,
monetary, taxation, auditing and/or legal factors. International investing may not be suitable for everyone. Indices are unmanaged and
not available for direct investment. This information should not be considered a solicitation or an offer to provide any Global Currents
Investment Management, LLC service in any jurisdiction where it would be unlawful to do so under the laws of that jurisdiction.